3. Business Context¶
This section defines the environmental, organizational, and operational context in which the Sillah system is developed and evaluated.
3.1 Stakeholder Profiles¶
The following table summarizes the major stakeholders involved in Sillah, including their expected value, attitudes, interests, and operational constraints.
| Stakeholder | Major Value | Attitude | Key Interests | Constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Families (Primary Users) | Early detection of hereditary risks; simplified health tracking | Highly receptive if intuitive and culturally aligned | Arabic interface, mobile-first design, clear alerts, privacy | Varying health literacy; privacy concerns |
| Healthcare Providers | Better-prepared patients; structured family history | Neutral to positive | Accurate data, clear risk summaries, appointment visibility | Must avoid additional workload |
| Administrators | Manage awareness content and system integrity | Positive | Secure content management, audit logs, role control | Must comply with PDPL |
| Public Health Authorities (Future) | Scalable preventive-health model | Very positive | Integration potential, population-level insights | Requires formal approval and compliance |
| Academic Stakeholders | Demonstration of full RE lifecycle | Supportive | Clear documentation, working prototype, traceability | Limited semester timeline |
3.2 Project Priorities¶
Project priorities are structured around drivers, constraints, and degrees of freedom.
| Dimension | Driver (Objective) | Constraint (Limitations) | Degree of Freedom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule | Deliver a complete prototype within the semester | Academic deadlines | Minor UI refinements allowed |
| Features | Core preventive-health capabilities must be implemented | Must satisfy SE311 requirements | 70–80% of high-priority features in initial release |
| Quality | High usability, reliability, and clarity | Limited team size | SUS ≥ 80; 90–95% test pass rate |
| Staff | Team of four students | No external developers | Flexible internal task distribution |
| Cost | Zero-cost academic implementation | No paid services | Open-source tools; free-tier hosting |
3.3 Deployment Considerations¶
-
Accessibility¶
Mobile-first design optimized for use across Saudi Arabia. Single time zone (AST) simplifies scheduling logic.
-
Security¶
HTTPS enforcement, secure authentication mechanisms, and server-side validation are required.
Production deployment would require encrypted databases.
-
Awareness Content¶
Educational material must undergo periodic review by qualified medical professionals.
-
Future Integration¶
Clinic integration may require staff training, workflow adaptation, and secure interoperability.
-
Scalability¶
Future national-scale deployment may require cloud hosting and load balancing mechanisms.
-
Localization¶
Full Arabic RTL support and culturally appropriate content are mandatory.